1. The film attracted controversy on its original release due to an early use of the word "fuck."
2. When first released theatrically the film was deemed so controversial by the New Zealand censors that it could only be screened before gender-segregated audiences in that country.
3. 27 September 2000: finally passed by the film censors in Ireland!
4. When the film was submitted to the BBFC in 1967 they requested 29 cuts to remove strong language and crude sexual references from Molly's final soliloquy. In return director Joseph Strick replaced all the offending footage with a blank screen and a high pitched shrieking sound. This resulted in the BBFC rescinding the cuts and passing the film fully intact.
Me cago en la idea de un Joyce genial y venerado. Da pena decirlo, ya es lugar común, pero la película del Ulises debería ser un Godard de porno hardcore. No, es mucho. Un Godard sí, pero pasado por la picaresca procesista de Olmedo y Porcel, como El gordo de América o Te rompo el rating.
2. When first released theatrically the film was deemed so controversial by the New Zealand censors that it could only be screened before gender-segregated audiences in that country.
3. 27 September 2000: finally passed by the film censors in Ireland!
4. When the film was submitted to the BBFC in 1967 they requested 29 cuts to remove strong language and crude sexual references from Molly's final soliloquy. In return director Joseph Strick replaced all the offending footage with a blank screen and a high pitched shrieking sound. This resulted in the BBFC rescinding the cuts and passing the film fully intact.
Me cago en la idea de un Joyce genial y venerado. Da pena decirlo, ya es lugar común, pero la película del Ulises debería ser un Godard de porno hardcore. No, es mucho. Un Godard sí, pero pasado por la picaresca procesista de Olmedo y Porcel, como El gordo de América o Te rompo el rating.
